Critical gaps across all dimensions. Only 1 of 10 tools has a visible, documented schema (set_goal_complete). Most tools (Shell, AskUser, SubAgent, Read, WebSearch, TodoWrite, Grep, Glob) lack explicit parameter schemas in the provided source. Descriptions are minimal or missing: 'display_html' has only 'genui' (5 chars, violates 20-char minimum). No evidence of input validation, error handling guidance, or output schema documentation. Tool names lack consistent verb-noun structure (e.g., 'Shell' is a noun, not an action). No parameter descriptions visible for most tools. This server appears to be in early development with tool definitions inferred from test files rather than formally registered.

• Add explicit input schemas to all 9 undocumented tools. Each schema must include parameter names, types (string, number, boolean, array, object), required flags, and descriptions. Use JSON Schema format.
• Write descriptions for all tools following the pattern: WHAT it does (1 sentence), WHEN to use it (vs similar tools), WHAT it returns (key fields). Target 50 - 200 characters per description.
• Rename tools to verb_noun format: execute_shell, ask_user, read_file, search_web, write_todo, grep_files, glob_files. This helps LLMs parse intent from the name alone.
• Add error handling guidance to destructive tools (Shell, set_goal_complete, SubAgent, TodoWrite). Include recovery hints: 'If the command fails, check syntax with: execute_shell --dry-run' or 'Confirm before deleting: set_goal_complete requires explicit summary.'
• Document output schemas for all tools. Specify which fields are returned, their types, and which are safe to pass to downstream tools. Include pagination info for list-returning tools (limit, offset, total_count).

Inferred effective spec: <=2025-11-25.

• Relies on Logging (deprecated) - log to stderr or use OpenTelemetry