Two tools with basic schemas and descriptions, but significant gaps in parameter documentation and error handling. Tool names follow verb_noun pattern (create, inspect) but descriptions lack actionable context for LLM selection. Input schemas present but parameters lack descriptions, critical for LLM reasoning. No output schema documentation visible. No error handling guidance. No security considerations documented despite WRITE risk on tool 1.

• Add explicit parameter descriptions for RootNode and Blackboard. Example: 'RootNode: Object with fields {type: string (Selector|Sequence|Parallel), children: array of node objects, ...}. Blackboard: Array of {key: string, type: string (int|float|bool|string)}.'
• Document output schemas. Example for create: '{success: boolean, filePath: string, className: string, lineCount: number}'. Example for inspect: '{nodeCount: number, depth: number, blackboardKeys: array, rootNodeType: string}'.
• Add error handling guidance. Example: 'If SavePath is invalid, returns error with suggestion. If RootNode structure is malformed, returns validation error listing required fields.'
• Expand tool descriptions to 100-150 chars explaining WHEN to use each tool. Example: 'Creates a new behavior tree script in your Unity project. Call this to generate a template tree structure; then customize nodes and blackboard variables in the editor.'
• Add constraints to SavePath: 'Must start with Assets/, use forward slashes, and end with .cs. Max 255 chars. Subdirectories will be created if missing.'

Inferred effective spec: <=2025-11-25.

• Relies on Logging (deprecated) - log to stderr or use OpenTelemetry