Server defines 7 tools with complete input schemas and descriptions. Naming follows verb_noun pattern (home, move, shift_to, roll_to, pitch_to, rotate_to, lift_to). Descriptions are domain-specific and explain motion control semantics (trapezoidal ramp-up/ramp-down). However, descriptions lack LLM-optimized guidance on WHEN to use each tool vs alternatives, and parameter descriptions are minimal. No output schema documentation visible. Error handling and recovery guidance absent. Tools are well-scoped (single responsibility) but lack composition hints.

• Document output schema for each tool. E.g., 'Returns {success: boolean, duration_ms: number, final_angles: {s1, s2, s3, s4, s5}}' so LLMs know what to expect and can chain calls.
• Enhance descriptions with selection guidance. E.g., 'Use move() to set multiple servos atomically in one command; use individual shift_to/roll_to for sequential fine-tuning.' This helps LLMs choose the right tool.
• Add min/max constraints to numeric parameters in schema. E.g., 'lift_to.angle: {type: number, minimum: 20, maximum: 150}' and validate server-side with actionable error messages.
• Document error modes and recovery paths. E.g., 'If servo is out of range, error will be "angle X exceeds limit [min, max]. Clamp to valid range and retry."'
• Add idempotentHint and destructiveHint annotations to tool definitions. These servo commands are idempotent (repeated calls with same angle are safe), annotate them so LLMs know they can safely retry.