Server has 4 tools with complete input schemas and descriptions, but quality is inconsistent. Tool names follow verb_noun convention (exec_command, read_file, write_file, upload_file). Descriptions are present but generic (avg ~80 chars, below 194-char baseline). Parameters have types and descriptions, but lack constraints (enums, ranges, patterns). No output schemas documented. Error handling guidance absent. Security concerns: exec_command accepts arbitrary shell commands with minimal validation; no mention of permission gates or audit trails. File operations lack path traversal protection details.

• Add output schema documentation for each tool. Example: exec_command should document {stdout: string, stderr: string, exit_code: int, duration_ms: int}.
• Expand tool descriptions to 150-250 chars. Include WHEN to use (e.g., 'Use to execute one-off commands; for batch operations, use exec_batch'), WHAT it returns, and prerequisites (e.g., 'Requires SSH key configured').
• Add enum constraints for priority parameter in exec_command: ['low', 'normal', 'high', 'critical']. Document what each priority means (queue behavior, timeout, etc.).
• Document path validation rules in file operation descriptions: 'Paths must be absolute and within /home or /var/www; symlinks are followed; parent directory creation requires create_dirs=true'.
• Add error recovery guidance: 'If command times out, retry with increased timeout or split into smaller commands. If file not found, call list_files() to discover available paths.'

Inferred effective spec: <=2025-11-25.

• Relies on Logging (deprecated) - log to stderr or use OpenTelemetry