The server exposes only one tool (read_flow_data) with a minimal schema. The tool definition appears in a test file (tier12_runtime_tools_e2e_test.go), not in production code, suggesting it is inferred rather than explicitly registered. The description is present but generic (58 chars). The input schema has two parameters (kind, static_id) with type strings and basic descriptions, but lacks critical metadata: no enums for 'kind', no format/pattern constraints, no output schema documentation. The codebase shows a complex Go application with provider connectors, packs, and runtime orchestration, but no visible MCP server implementation, tool registration mechanism, or protocol handler. This appears to be a non-MCP application that was incorrectly classified as an MCP server.

• Verify this is actually an MCP server. Search the codebase for MCP protocol imports (e.g., 'github.com/modelcontextprotocol/sdk-go'), server initialization, and tool registration. If absent, this is not an MCP server.
• If MCP: add explicit tool registration with full JSON Schema. Define 'kind' as an enum (e.g., ["static_file", "config_file", "manifest"]) instead of free-form string.
• Document the output schema. Specify what fields read_flow_data returns (e.g., {"data": string, "source": string, "timestamp": string, "access_level": string}).
• Expand description to 100-200 chars. Explain: 'Reads static flow data files with access control. Use this to retrieve configuration, manifests, or data files. Requires valid static_id and appropriate flow data permissions. Returns file content and metadata.'
• Add error handling: document what happens when static_id is invalid, access is denied, or file is not found. Return actionable errors like 'Access denied: user lacks flow_data:read permission. Contact admin.'