BugPack defines 3 tools with basic schemas and descriptions. All tools have names starting with action verbs (list_, get_) and descriptions present. However, parameter descriptions are minimal (10-30 chars), lack detail on constraints/formats, and several parameters are marked optional without clear defaults. Input schemas exist but lack enum constraints for status values. Output schemas are not documented. Error handling and recovery guidance are absent. The tools follow a simple read-only pattern but lack the depth expected for production use.

• Add formal enum constraints to the 'status' parameter in list_bugs: {"type": "string", "enum": ["pending", "annotating", "generated", "fixed", "closed"]}. This prevents hallucinated values and is machine-parseable.
• Document output schemas for all three tools. E.g., list_bugs should return {"bugs": [{"id": string, "number": number, "title": string, "status": string, "project": string}], "total": number}. This enables LLMs to chain calls and extract required fields.
• Expand parameter descriptions to 50-100 characters with actionable constraints. E.g., 'Filter by status (pending|annotating|generated|fixed|closed). Omit to return all statuses.' instead of just listing values.
• Add error handling guidance: 'If bug_id is not found, returns error with available bug IDs. If screenshot_index exceeds available screenshots, returns error with max index.' This guides LLM recovery.
• Clarify parameter relationships in get_bug_context: 'Either bug_id (full ID) or both bug_number and project (lookup within project) must be provided. If both are given, bug_id takes precedence.'