A portfolio repository containing multiple applications: an AI agent for real estate news (ImoveisAI), a RAG SaaS base application, and webhook handlers. Not a single MCP server.
This portfolio contains multiple disconnected applications with minimal tool definitions. Only 5 tools are exposed, with severe gaps: 3 of 5 tools lack visible input schemas (validate_ticket, list_tickets, search_properties_vector show no schema details in source); descriptions are present but generic (10-80 chars, below the 194-char baseline); no output schemas documented; no error handling guidance; no parameter validation rules. The codebase shows FastAPI/LangChain usage but no MCP server implementation visible. Tools appear to be loaded from external Toolbox service (ToolboxClient), not defined locally. This is a portfolio of demo applications, not a production MCP server.
Insert a lead into the database with name and email
Insert a flight ticket booking into the system
List all flight tickets
Search properties using vector embeddings, returns top 3 matching news items
Validate a flight ticket before booking
No MCP server implementation detected. Tools are loaded from external Toolbox service via ToolboxClient, not registered as MCP tools. Cannot verify MCP protocol compliance.
Three tools (validate_ticket, list_tickets, search_properties_vector) have no visible input schemas in source code. Cannot verify parameter types, constraints, or descriptions.
Descriptions are generic and under 50 characters for most tools (e.g., validate_ticket and list_tickets have no descriptions at all). Baseline is 194 chars. LLMs cannot determine when to select these tools.
| Scored | Grade | Overall | Spec posture | Rubric |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-09-23 | F | 32 | 2026-07-28+ | v2 |
No output schemas documented for any tool. LLMs cannot plan downstream calls or extract required fields (e.g., ticket_id for chaining).
No error handling guidance. Tools provide no recovery hints, error classification, or actionable messages for LLM retry logic.