Server defines 5 tools with action-based dispatch via ConsolidatedTool pattern. All tools have descriptions (10-200 chars) and flat input schemas listing all possible parameters. However, critical gaps undermine quality: (1) Tool names lack action verbs, 'stories', 'knowledge', 'projects', 'workflow', 'docs' are nouns, not verb_noun patterns like 'list_stories' or 'search_knowledge'. LLMs struggle to infer intent from noun-only names. (2) Parameter descriptions are minimal (5-30 chars); many lack format/constraint guidance. (3) Output schemas are undocumented, no evidence of return type definitions. (4) Error handling is absent, no recovery guidance or actionable error messages visible. (5) Consolidated tool pattern uses flat schema with runtime validation, which is pragmatic but obscures required-per-action semantics from the LLM.

• Rename tools to verb_noun pattern: 'list_stories', 'search_knowledge', 'get_project', 'start_workflow', 'get_document'. This enables LLMs to infer intent from the name alone.
• Expand parameter descriptions to 50-100 chars and include format/constraint guidance. E.g., 'status: Filter by story status (enum: backlog, ready, in_progress, done)' instead of 'Filter by status (optional for list action)'.
• Document output schemas for each action. Specify return fields, types, and structure. E.g., 'Returns: {stories: [{id, title, status, points}], total_count, next_cursor}'.
• Add error handling with actionable recovery guidance. E.g., 'Story not found. Try list_stories() with filters to find the correct ID.' Categorize errors as retryable, user-fixable, or fatal.
• Consider splitting consolidated tools into separate tools per action (e.g., 'list_stories', 'get_story', 'create_story') to enable schema-level validation and clearer LLM intent inference.