Server has 7 tools with complete naming and descriptions, but critical gaps in schema documentation and error handling. Tool names follow verb_noun pattern (stake_deposit, stake_verify, etc.). Descriptions are present (avg ~150 chars) and explain WHAT the tool does and WHEN to use it. However, input schemas lack explicit type constraints (no enums for currency/status), parameter descriptions are minimal, and output schemas are completely undocumented. No error handling guidance visible, tools return dict but LLM cannot infer structure or recovery paths. Destructive operations (slash_stake, dispute_resolve) lack confirmation patterns. No validation rules documented for numeric parameters (amount, slash_amount must be > 0 but not enforced in visible code).

• Document output schema for each tool. Example: tool_stake_verify should return {agent_id: string, balance: float, trust_tier: string, slash_history: array, trust_score: float}. Include field types and descriptions.
• Add enum constraint for 'currency' parameter. Define allowed values (REP, ETH, USDC, etc.) in schema and description. Replace free-form string with constrained choice.
• Add min/max bounds for numeric parameters. Document: 'amount must be > 0 and <= 1000000', 'slash_amount must be > 0 and <= agent's current balance', 'top_n must be 1-100'.
• Implement confirmation pattern for destructive tools. Add optional 'confirm: bool' parameter to slash_stake and dispute_resolve. Return {status: 'pending_confirmation', confirmation_id: string} if confirm=false, then require explicit confirm=true to execute.
• Enhance parameter descriptions with format and constraint hints. Example: 'agent_id: Unique identifier for the agent (DID, UUID, or username; 1-255 chars, alphanumeric + dash/underscore)' instead of bare 'Agent identifier to look up'.