34 tools with complete JSON schemas and descriptions, but quality is uneven. Naming is verb-forward (x_post, x_reply, x_delete_tweet) and mostly clear. Descriptions are present but brief (avg ~80 chars, below the 194-char baseline). Parameter descriptions are minimal or absent for many tools. No output schemas documented. Error handling is generic ('ok: false, output: msg'). Tools like x_raw_api_call expose low-level API details rather than abstracting them. No idempotency hints, no confirmation patterns for destructive ops (x_delete_tweet), no pagination guidance for list tools (x_get_followers, x_get_following). Parameter validation is weak, no enum constraints on optional fields, no format specs for IDs.

• Document output schemas for all tools. Specify which fields are returned (e.g., x_post returns {tweet_id, text, created_at, author_id}). This enables agents to chain calls and extract IDs for follow-up actions.
• Add confirmation or dry-run support to x_delete_tweet. Implement a 'confirm' parameter or a separate 'preview_delete' tool so agents can verify before destroying data.
• Add pagination to list tools: include 'limit' (default 20, max 100), 'offset' or 'cursor', and return 'total_count' and 'next_cursor' in responses. Document in tool descriptions.
• Expand parameter descriptions to include ranges, defaults, and constraints. E.g., 'count: Number of results to return (default 10, max 100)' instead of just 'Number of results'.
• Replace x_raw_api_call with domain-specific tools for common API patterns (e.g., x_get_community_members, x_update_community_settings). If raw access is needed, wrap it with validation and error guidance.