Server has 5 tools with complete input schemas and descriptions. Naming follows verb_noun convention (analyze_video, extract_video_frames, get_video_transcript, get_frame_at_time, video_to_strategy). Descriptions are substantive (100-250 chars), exceeding the 10-char minimum. All parameters have type definitions and descriptions. However, output schemas are not formally documented, tools return list[TextContent | ImageContent] or str without specifying field structure. Error handling is absent: no guidance on retryability, user-fixable vs fatal errors, or recovery paths. No input validation constraints (e.g., max_frames bounds, URL format validation). Parameter descriptions lack format/range details (e.g., 'timestamp: Time in seconds' does not specify valid range). Tool descriptions do not clarify when to use one over another (analyze_video vs extract_video_frames distinction is unclear).

• Document output schemas explicitly. For analyze_video, specify: returns [{ type: 'text', text: string }, { type: 'image', data: base64, mimeType: 'image/jpeg' }, ...]. Include field cardinality and order.
• Add error handling guidance to each tool description. E.g., 'Returns error if URL is unreachable, video format unsupported, or captions unavailable. Retry-safe for network errors; user must provide valid URL for format errors.'
• Add numeric bounds to parameters: max_frames (1 - 100), timestamp (0 - video_duration), framework (enum already present). Include in parameter descriptions: 'max_frames: integer, 1 - 100 (default: 8)'.
• Clarify tool selection criteria. Rename or document: 'Use analyze_video for full analysis (frames + transcript); extract_video_frames for frames only; video_to_strategy for trading-specific extraction.'
• Implement result limits and pagination. Cap frame lists at 50 items; return total_frames and next_offset. Document in tool descriptions: 'Returns up to 50 frames; use offset parameter for additional frames.'