Five tools with complete input schemas and descriptions, but significant quality gaps. Tool names lack clear action verbs (verify_plugin_install, start_claude_import_onboarding are vague about what happens). Descriptions are present but generic (10-50 chars for some params). No output schemas documented anywhere. Parameter descriptions are minimal or missing entirely (e.g., 'claudeHome' has only 'Path to the Claude home directory' with no format guidance). No error handling guidance, no recovery paths, no idempotent/destructive hints. Tools 3 and 5 perform irreversible operations (WRITE, IRREVERSIBLE) but lack confirmation patterns or dry-run support. No tool composition guidance or chaining IDs in responses.

• Document output schemas for all tools. Define what fields each response contains (e.g., verify_plugin_install returns {status, title, summary, checks[], nextAction}). Include field types and descriptions so LLMs know what to extract.
• Add confirmation/dry-run pattern to finish_claude_import and preview_claude_import. Require explicit confirmation before overwriting real Codex configs. Offer a 'dry_run' parameter to preview changes without applying them.
• Rename tools to use clear action verbs: verify_plugin_install → check_plugin_health; start_claude_import_onboarding → begin_import_setup; finish_claude_import → apply_import.
• Expand parameter descriptions with format, constraints, and examples. E.g., claudeHome: 'Absolute path to Claude Code config directory (default: ~/.claude). Must exist and contain config.json. Example: /Users/alice/.claude'.
• Add error classification and recovery guidance to all responses. When a check fails, return {status, reason, nextAction, recoverySteps}. E.g., 'Claude home missing. Try: (1) Check ~/.claude exists, (2) Pass claudeHome=/path/to/claude, (3) Run Claude Code setup first.'