Loading ToolBench
Elefante demonstrates solid tool design with consistent naming (verb_noun pattern), comprehensive parameter schemas using Zod, and clear descriptions. All 7 tools follow memory_* naming convention. Schemas are well-structured with type constraints and enums. However, output schemas are not explicitly documented in the code, and error handling lacks recovery guidance. Tool descriptions are adequate (100-200 chars) but could be more prescriptive about when to use each tool vs. alternatives. Parameter descriptions are present and detailed, meeting baseline expectations.
Permanently delete a memory. The content is preserved in Git history.
List memories in the vault. Returns metadata only (no body). Use memory_read to get full content.
Retrieve a specific memory by its ID.
Search the memory vault. Returns memories ranked by relevance.
Pull the latest changes from the remote vault. Use this before memory_search to ensure you have the latest context.
Update an existing memory. Only provided fields are changed.
Store a memory in the vault. Use type 'user' for user preferences/facts, 'feedback' for behavioral guidance, 'project' for active work context, 'reference' for external resource pointers.
Output schemas not documented. Tool descriptions state what is returned (e.g., 'Returns memories ranked by relevance') but do not specify the structure of returned fields (id, name, type, body, profile, tags, created, updated, etc.). LLMs cannot plan downstream tool calls without knowing what fields to extract.
memory_delete lacks confirmation or dry-run pattern. Destructive operations should support a confirmation step or explicit acknowledgment to prevent accidental data loss. Current implementation allows immediate deletion with only an ID parameter.
Error handling does not provide recovery guidance. errorResult() returns a generic error message without suggesting next steps. E.g., 'Memory not found' should suggest 'Try memory_search() to find the correct ID' or 'Use memory_list() to see available memories.'
| Scored | Grade | Overall | Spec posture | Rubric |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-09-23 | C | 62 | 2026-07-28+ | v2 |
memory_sync description is vague. It says 'Pull the latest changes from the remote vault' but does not explain when to call it, what happens if sync fails, or whether it is idempotent. The empty input schema {} suggests no parameters, but the description implies a network operation that could fail.
Tool composition assumes agent knows to call memory_sync before memory_search. The instructions mention 'Use this before memory_search to ensure you have the latest context' but this dependency is not enforced or validated. If an agent skips sync, it may return stale results without warning.