Three tools with basic descriptions and minimal schemas. Tool names follow verb_noun convention (init, list_namespaces, list_actions), which is good. However, descriptions are generic and lack actionable context. The init tool has an empty input schema ({}), which is acceptable for zero-parameter tools. list_namespaces and list_actions have minimal parameter documentation. No output schemas are documented, forcing LLMs to infer response structure. No error handling guidance, no parameter constraints, and no indication of what fields downstream tools should expect. Schemas are present but sparse, no type validation beyond basic strings.

• Document output schemas for all three tools. Example for list_namespaces: 'Returns {namespaces: [{name: string, toolCount: number, resourceCount: number, promptCount: number}], total: number}'. This enables LLMs to chain calls correctly.
• Expand init description to clarify side effects: 'Creates a .mcpgeneralrc.json config file in the current directory with example namespace definitions and agent rules. Safe to run multiple times, will not overwrite existing config.'
• Add parameter constraints to list_actions. Describe what constitutes a valid namespace name, whether it is case-sensitive, and suggest calling list_namespaces first if the namespace is unknown.
• Add error recovery guidance: 'If namespace not found, call list_namespaces to see available options. If no config exists, call init first.'
• Document the typical workflow in tool descriptions: 'Call list_namespaces to discover available namespaces, then list_actions to see tools/resources/prompts in a specific namespace.'