This server exposes 7 tools with significant definition gaps. Tool names lack clear action verbs (agent_file, agent_trash, agent_exec, agent_search, agent_skill, manage_agent, exec_log). Descriptions exist but are terse (10-50 chars for most), leaving LLM intent unclear. Input schemas are present with enums and basic types, but parameter descriptions are minimal or missing context. No output schemas documented. Error handling is absent, no recovery guidance, no categorization of retryable vs fatal errors. The server implements dangerous operations (shell exec, file write, trash recovery) without confirmation patterns or permission gates. Security concerns: no mention of credential injection, no audit logging visible, no rate limiting.

• Rename tools to action-verb form: agent_file → read_file, write_file, delete_file, list_directory; agent_exec → execute_command; agent_search → search_files; agent_skill → load_skill, run_skill; manage_agent → list_agents, switch_agent; agent_trash → list_trash, restore_from_trash.
• Expand descriptions to 100-200 chars. Example: 'read_file: Retrieve file content from the agent's local filesystem. Use this to inspect configuration, logs, or source code. Returns file content as text or binary.' Include WHEN to use and WHAT it returns.
• Document output schemas for all tools. E.g., agent_search should return {results: [{path, name, matchContext}], totalCount, hasMore}. agent_file read should return {content, encoding, size}.
• Add confirmation pattern for destructive ops. agent_exec should require a 'force' parameter (default false) and return a confirmation token on first call; LLM must pass token on retry to execute. Or implement a separate 'confirm_command' tool.
• Add error handling with recovery hints. E.g., if agent_file read fails with 'File not found', return 'File not found at {path}. Try search_files(pattern={filename}) to locate it.' Categorize errors as retryable (timeout, rate limit) vs user-fixable (invalid path, permission denied).