Critical failures across all dimensions. Tool definitions are inferred from a registry file (tool-registry.ts) with no visible schema definitions, parameter types, or descriptions in the provided source. The 18 tools lack explicit input/output schemas, parameter documentation, and error handling guidance. Descriptions are present but generic (10-50 chars), far below the 50-200 char LLM-optimized baseline. No evidence of enum constraints, validation rules, or recovery guidance. STDIO transport caps protocol readiness at 50, but definition quality is the primary blocker.

• Add explicit JSON Schema definitions for all 18 tools. Include type, description, and constraints for every parameter. Example: { 'type': 'object', 'properties': { 'brief': { 'type': 'string', 'description': 'UI brief (50-500 chars describing layout, components, and styling)' } }, 'required': ['brief'] }
• Expand tool descriptions to 80-150 characters. Include WHAT the tool does, WHEN to call it, and any prerequisites. Example: 'Generate shadcn/ui components from a brief description. Call this first to create initial UI. Requires a clear description of layout, components, and styling preferences.'
• Add parameter descriptions for all tools that accept input. For each parameter, state the expected format, valid values, and constraints. Example: 'feedback (string, 50-500 chars): Specific feedback on the generated UI (e.g., "Make buttons larger", "Use blue instead of green")'
• Implement confirmation/dry-run for irreversible tools (ship_react_page, ship_feature_flow, apply_files). Return { 'status': 'pending_confirmation', 'preview': {...}, 'message': 'Ready to ship. Confirm to proceed.' } and require a confirm_ship tool call.
• Add error recovery guidance to tool descriptions. Example: 'If generation fails, check that the brief is clear and under 500 chars. If workspace scan fails, ensure the project has a valid package.json and node_modules.'