13 tools with consistent verb-noun naming (get_, create_, update_, list_, add_). All have descriptions (avg ~100 chars, within baseline 34-392). Input schemas present for all tools with proper type definitions. However, output schemas are undocumented, LLMs cannot predict response structure for chaining. Error handling is minimal (generic try-catch). Parameter descriptions are adequate but lack constraints (enums, ranges, format specs). No tool annotations (readOnlyHint/destructiveHint). Risk levels are resolved server-side (good), but image handling via base64 vs URI references adds complexity without clear guidance on when to use each.

• Document output schemas for all tools. Example: get_assessment returns {assessment_id, title, description, status, vulnerabilities: [{id, title, severity}], created_at, updated_at}. This enables LLM chaining.
• Add tool annotations: mark create_vulnerability, update_vulnerability, upload_assessment_image with destructiveHint=true; mark all get_* and list_* with readOnlyHint=true.
• Convert severity/impact/likelihood parameters to enums. Example: severity: enum('Critical', 'High', 'Medium', 'Low') with description 'Severity level. Server resolves to instance-specific ID.'
• Enhance error messages with recovery guidance. Example: 'Assessment not found. Try get_assessment_queue() to list available assessments, or provide a valid assessment_id.'
• Clarify image handling: document when include_base64_images=true returns {image_data: 'data:image/png;base64,...'} vs false returns {image_url: 'getImage?id=...'}. Add to tool descriptions.