Single tool 'agent' has a well-structured schema with 7 parameters, all typed and described. However, the tool description (169 chars) is adequate but generic, it does not clearly state WHEN to use this vs. other tools, what prerequisites exist, or how it differs from direct LLM calls. Parameter descriptions are present but lack actionable constraints (e.g., max_turns default is 10, but no guidance on when to increase it; isolation enum has only one value 'worktree', making the enum redundant). The tool performs a complex, stateful operation (spawning sub-agents) but lacks error handling guidance, no mention of failure modes, recovery steps, or what happens if an agent times out. Output schema is not documented in the visible source. Risk classification (WRITE) is correct but no confirmation/dry-run pattern is evident. Overall, the tool is functional but falls short of production-grade clarity expected for an agentic operation.

• Add explicit output schema documentation: 'Returns {agent_id: string, status: "completed"|"timeout"|"error", final_result: string, execution_log?: string, error_message?: string}'.
• Expand tool description to 150-250 chars: explain when to delegate vs. call tools directly, mention that agents run autonomously with their own loop, and note that results may take time.
• Document error modes in description: 'If max_turns is exceeded, returns status=timeout with partial results. If a tool is unavailable, agent fails with error_message listing missing tools.'
• Replace 'isolation' enum with a boolean flag 'use_worktree: boolean' (default true) to clarify intent and avoid redundant enum.
• Add parameter constraint guidance: 'max_turns: 1-50 (default 10). Increase for complex multi-step tasks; decrease to limit cost and latency.'

Inferred effective spec: <=2025-11-25.

• Relies on Logging (deprecated) - log to stderr or use OpenTelemetry