Transcribe and diarize meeting audio using Whisper API and speaker diarization service
Four tools with basic verb-noun naming (transcribe_*, diarize_*, analyze_*), but descriptions lack depth and parameter documentation is minimal. All tools accept only a single 'url' parameter with minimal description. No output schemas documented. No error handling guidance. Descriptions average ~60 chars, below the 194-char baseline for production tools. No parameter constraints, enums, or format specifications. Tools lack information about what fields are returned, making downstream composition difficult.
Perform full meeting analysis: transcription + diarization + speaker attribution.
Identify speakers in meeting audio from URL.
Transcribe audio from a given URL using Whisper API. Args: url: The URL of the audio file to transcribe. Returns: The full transcribed text from the audio.
Transcribe meeting audio from URL with word-level timing.
No output schemas documented. Tools return strings but LLMs cannot infer structure of transcription results, speaker data, or analysis output. Downstream tools cannot chain on missing field references.
Parameter descriptions are trivial (e.g., 'URL of the audio file to transcribe'). No guidance on URL format, supported protocols, file size limits, timeout behavior, or retry semantics. LLMs cannot validate input before calling.
No error handling guidance. Code includes retry logic and timeout handling (MAX_RETRIES=3, RETRY_DELAY=2, timeout=600s) but tools do not document what errors are retryable, what to do on timeout, or how to recover from Whisper API failures.
Inferred effective spec: <=2025-11-25.
| Scored | Grade | Overall | Spec posture | Rubric |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-09-23 | F | 38 | <=2025-11-25 | v2 |
Tool descriptions do not distinguish use cases. 'transcribe_audio' vs 'transcribe_meeting_audio' both transcribe; unclear when to use each. 'analyze_meeting' combines transcription + diarization + attribution but description does not explain this composition or when to call it vs separate tools.
No pagination or result limits documented. Code splits audio into 20-second chunks and concatenates results, but tools do not specify max output size, whether results are streamed, or how to handle very long audio files (e.g., 8-hour meetings).