Server has 8 tools with consistent verb_noun naming (get_*, compare_*) and all include descriptions. However, descriptions are terse (avg 80 chars, well below the 194-char baseline for A+ tools) and lack actionable context. Parameter descriptions exist but are minimal. No output schemas are documented in the code, LLMs cannot predict response structure. Error handling is present in the API client but not surfaced to tool callers. No tool annotations (readOnlyHint, destructiveHint, idempotentHint) despite all tools being read-only. Schema validation is basic; no enum constraints or format specifications visible.

• Document output schemas for all 8 tools. Example: get_player_stats should return {nickname: string, elo: number, level: int, region: string, lifetime_kd: number, hs_percent: number, win_rate: number, current_streak: int, best_streak: int}. Include this in tool registration or docstring.
• Expand tool descriptions to 150 - 250 chars with WHEN/WHY context. E.g., 'get_recent_form: Aggregated performance over last N matches (win rate, K/D, streak, map breakdown). Use this to assess current form; use get_match_history for individual match details.'
• Add readOnlyHint: true to all 8 tool definitions to signal safety and enable LLM retry optimization.
• Add min/max constraints to numeric parameters in schema. E.g., limit: {type: integer, minimum: 1, maximum: 100, default: 10}. Update parameter descriptions to reference these constraints.
• Wrap FaceitAPI exceptions in tool-level error handlers that return structured errors with recovery guidance. E.g., 'Player not found. Try search_players() with a partial nickname.' or 'Rate limited. Retry in 60 seconds.'

Inferred effective spec: <=2025-11-25.

• Relies on Logging (deprecated) - log to stderr or use OpenTelemetry