Stargate exposes 32 tools with basic naming and descriptions, but significant gaps in schema completeness, parameter documentation, and error handling. Tool names follow verb_noun convention (list_contracts, create_task, etc.), which is good. However, most tools lack detailed parameter descriptions, output schemas are not documented, and error recovery guidance is absent. Many parameters are minimally described (e.g., 'The contract ID' with no format or validation hints). No tool annotations (readOnlyHint, destructiveHint) are visible. The server appears to be HTTP-based, which is positive for protocol readiness, but definition quality lags production standards.

• Document output schemas for all 32 tools. Include field names, types, and descriptions. Example: create_task should return {task_id: string, contract_id: string, title: string, status: string, created_at: ISO8601}.
• Expand parameter descriptions to 50-150 characters. Include format hints, valid ranges, and constraints. E.g., 'contract_id (string, 32-char hex): The unique contract identifier' instead of 'The contract ID'.
• Add tool annotations: mark read-only tools with readOnlyHint=true (list_*, get_*), destructive tools with destructiveHint=true (delete_*, reject_*, rework_*), and idempotent tools with idempotentHint=true (get_*, list_*).
• Add error recovery guidance to tool descriptions. E.g., 'If contract not found, call list_contracts() to discover available contracts.' This guides agent retry logic.
• For list_* tools, document pagination: accept limit (1-100, default 20) and offset/cursor parameters, and return total_count or next_cursor in responses.