Five tools with clear verb-noun naming (search_docs, fetch_page, list_pages, get_sites, get_version). All have descriptions (10 - 100 chars, within baseline 34 - 392 range). Input schemas present with type and description for all parameters. However, output schemas are not documented in the visible code, critical for LLM planning. Parameter descriptions are minimal (e.g., 'Name of the site' lacks context on format/constraints). No error handling guidance visible. Tools are read-only and well-scoped, but lack the depth expected for production use (pagination, result limits, recovery hints).

• Document output schemas for all tools. Example: search_docs returns {results: [{page_url, chunk_id, text, score}], total_count, next_cursor}. This enables LLM to chain tools and extract IDs for fetch_page.
• Add constraint details to parameter descriptions. E.g., 'site: Name of the configured site (case-insensitive; call get_sites() to list available options)' and 'limit: Maximum results to return (1 - 100, default 20)'.
• Implement pagination for search_docs: add offset/cursor parameter and return total_count or next_cursor. Cap default limit at 20 to prevent context bloat.
• Add error handling with recovery hints. E.g., if site not found, return 'Site "xyz" not found. Available sites: [list]. Call get_sites() to discover all options.'
• Clarify get_sites and get_version descriptions. E.g., 'get_sites: Returns list of all configured documentation sites with their index status and search engine type. Call this first to discover available sources.' and 'get_version: Returns the MCP server version and build info for debugging/compatibility checks.'