23 tools with READ_ONLY risk profile. All tools have descriptions (10-200 chars, baseline 194), but 18 of 23 lack parameter descriptions entirely. Input schemas present for all tools with proper JSON Schema types, but parameter-level documentation is sparse. No output schemas documented. Error handling absent, tools return raw results with no recovery guidance. Tool naming follows verb_noun convention (list_, get_, scan_, check_, find_, run_, parse_, predict_, generate_, current_). Composition is reasonable (single responsibility), but no pagination support despite tools like list_processes and get_large_files returning potentially large result sets. No idempotency hints, no permission gates, no audit trail patterns. cli_tool_agent (tool 23) is a WRITE tool with minimal parameter descriptions.

• Document output schemas for all 23 tools. Specify field names, types, and whether results are paginated. Example: 'Returns {processes: [{name: string, cpu_percent: number, pid: integer}], total: integer}'.
• Add parameter descriptions to all 12 tools missing them. For each param, state: what it controls, valid range/format, and any constraints. Example: 'top_n (integer, 1-100): Number of top processes to return by CPU usage. Default 25.'
• Implement pagination for list_processes, get_large_files, list_branches, get_recent_commits, scan_directory. Add limit (default 20, max 100) and offset/cursor parameters. Return total_count in response.
• Add error handling with recovery guidance. Example: 'If path not found, try scan_directory() with a parent directory first.' Categorize errors as retryable vs user-fixable.
• For cli_tool_agent (WRITE tool), add a dry_run parameter (default true) and require explicit confirmation before code generation. Return a preview of generated code for user review before execution.