Ideate has 15 tools with schemas and descriptions present, but quality is inconsistent. Most tool descriptions are trivial (1-20 chars: 'get_idea', 'list_resources', 'list_backlog'). Parameter descriptions are present but often generic. Schemas lack proper type constraints (many string params without enums or patterns). No error handling guidance. No tool annotations (readOnlyHint, destructiveHint). Composition is reasonable (separate CRUD tools), but naming could be clearer (e.g., 'list_backlog_by_slug' vs 'list_backlog', the distinction is not obvious from names alone). Output schemas are not documented. This is typical of a community server that prioritizes functionality over LLM-friendly design.

• Expand trivial descriptions to 50-200 chars. E.g., 'get_idea' → 'Retrieve the current idea being developed, including its name, summary, and metadata. Call this first to understand the active context.'
• Add tool annotations: mark delete_* tools with destructiveHint=true, read-only tools with readOnlyHint=true, and idempotent tools with idempotentHint=true.
• Consolidate backlog tools: rename 'list_backlog_by_slug' to 'list_backlog_for_idea' and 'add_backlog_items_by_slug' to 'add_backlog_items_to_idea' to clarify the distinction from current-idea variants.
• Document output schemas for list_backlog, list_resources, and match_resource_urls. Include field types, pagination info, and example structures.
• Add error handling guidance to parameter descriptions. E.g., 'url (required): URL of the resource to remove. If not found, returns 404 with available URLs.' This enables LLM self-correction.