Three tools with complete schemas and descriptions, but significant gaps in parameter documentation and output schema clarity. All tools are READ_ONLY and well-named with action verbs (find_, read_, list_). Descriptions are adequate (100-150 chars) but lack specificity about return structure and when to use each tool. The 'limit' parameter in find_docs has a default but no min/max bounds. Output schemas are not documented, LLMs cannot predict what fields to expect from search results or document content. Error handling is minimal (generic 'not found' messages). No parameter validation guidance or recovery hints.

• Document the output schema for each tool. For find_docs, specify: 'Returns an array of objects with fields: title (string), objectId (string), preview (string, max 500 chars), url (string).' For list_doc_topics, specify: 'Returns an object with fields: total (number), topics (array of {topic: string, count: number}).'
• Add min/max bounds to the 'limit' parameter: 'Maximum number of results to return (1 - 100, default: 10).' This prevents LLMs from requesting unreasonable result sets.
• Enhance error messages with recovery guidance. E.g., 'No documents found for query: "xyz". Try a simpler query, or call list_doc_topics() to see available categories.'
• Clarify the tool selection workflow in descriptions. E.g., add to find_docs: 'Use this to search by keyword. If you need to explore available topics first, call list_doc_topics().'
• Document the objectId format in read_doc description: 'The unique ID of the document (obtained from find_docs, e.g., "ui-components-button"). This is a path-based identifier with slashes replaced by hyphens.'