Two tools with basic schemas and descriptions, but significant gaps in parameter documentation, error handling, and output schema clarity. Both tools lack descriptions for all parameters (critical violation). Naming is acceptable (verb_noun pattern), but schemas are incomplete. No error recovery guidance, no pagination support despite potentially large result sets, and no output schema documentation. This server falls in the 'poor' category with major issues typical of early-stage implementations.

• Add descriptions to all parameters: 'query' (search text, 10-500 chars), 'top_k' (1-50, default 5), 'filters' (ChromaDB where clause, e.g. {"category": "Household Cleaning"}). Reference pattern:tool-description.
• Document output schema for each tool. E.g., rag.search returns [{doc_id, sku, title, price, rating, brand, ingredients}]. web.search returns [{title, url, snippet, profile, price, availability}]. Include field types and nullability.
• Add error handling: catch exceptions in web.search (Brave API timeout, invalid key) and return {"error": "Brave API unavailable. Try again in 30s.", "retryable": true}. Same for rag.search ChromaDB failures.
• Document result limits and pagination: 'top_k must be 1-50 (default 5). Results are not paginated; for larger datasets, refine your query.' Add offset/limit params if needed.
• Enhance tool descriptions with WHEN/WHY: 'Use rag.search for product recommendations from indexed Amazon data (fast, offline). Use web.search for current prices, availability, and live product info (slower, requires API key).'