10 tools with consistent verb-noun naming (list_, get_, generate_, validate_, audit_, create_, suggest_). All have descriptions (avg 95 chars, within 10-1024 range). Input schemas present with type definitions and parameter descriptions. However, output schemas are not documented in the visible code, critical for LLM planning. No error handling guidance visible. Parameters lack constraints (enums, ranges, format specs) that would prevent hallucinated values. Tool descriptions are functional but generic; they lack WHEN-to-use context and dependency hints. No evidence of pagination support despite tools returning lists (list_progress_bars, create_gallery_demo). Risk annotations present but incomplete, no confirmation patterns for generation tools that produce code artifacts.

• Document output schemas for all tools. Example: generate_progress_bar returns {source: string, format: 'react'|'html-css', metadata: {id, label, value}}. This enables LLM planning.
• Add parameter constraints: value (0-100), max (>0), theme (enum or pattern), status (enum: default|success|warning|error|paused). Use descriptions like 'Progress value (0-100, required)' and JSON Schema min/max/enum.
• Add error handling guidance: 'If validation fails, check recipe schema against get_design_tokens(). If generation times out, try a simpler prompt or use a catalog ID instead.'
• Clarify tool selection: 'Use suggest_progress_bar_by_prompt to find a catalog ID from natural language. Use generate_progress_bar to customize that ID. Use get_progress_bar_source to retrieve existing source without generation.'
• Add pagination to list_progress_bars: limit (1-100, default 20), offset (0+), and return {items: [...], total: N, hasMore: bool}.