Single tool 'audit_website' has a clear, action-oriented name and reasonable description (127 chars). Input schema is present with proper type and description for the 'url' parameter. However, the output schema is not documented in the visible source code, the tool description mentions it returns 'overall score, category breakdown, and actionable fix recommendations' but no structured output schema is visible. This forces LLMs to guess at response structure. The tool is READ_ONLY and well-scoped (one responsibility), but lacks error handling guidance and output documentation that would elevate it to 70+.

• Document the complete output schema with field names, types, and descriptions. Example: { overall_score: number (0-100), categories: { webmcp: number, openapi: number, ... }, recommendations: string[] }
• Add error handling guidance to the tool description: 'Returns error if URL is invalid, unreachable, or times out after 30s. Try a different URL or check network connectivity.'
• Add readOnlyHint: true to the tool schema to explicitly declare it is safe to call without side effects.
• Specify URL format constraint in the parameter description: 'Must be a valid HTTP(S) URL starting with http:// or https://'
• Consider adding optional parameters for timeout (default 30s) and follow_redirects (default true) to give agents control over audit behavior.