24 tools with significant quality gaps. Most tools have basic descriptions (50-150 chars) but lack depth on WHEN to use them or prerequisites. Input schemas present but sparse: many parameters lack type constraints (enums missing for status/role fields). No output schemas documented. Error handling absent, tools return HTTP status codes without recovery guidance. Security concerns: no visible permission gates on destructive operations (deleteProject, deleteTask), no audit logging visible. Tool composition issues: processQuery appears to duplicate functionality of other tools. Naming is generally clear (verb_noun pattern) but some tools are overly broad (updateTask handles 6 different fields).

• Document output schemas for all 24 tools. Specify which fields are returned, their types, and which IDs/references are included for chaining. Example: createProject should return {project_id, name, created_at, members[]}.
• Add permission gates to deleteProject and deleteTask. Verify user is admin before executing. Return 403 Forbidden with message 'Only admins can delete projects' if unauthorized. Implement audit logging for all destructive operations.
• Convert status/role/enum parameters to explicit JSON Schema enums. For createContract, change status from free-form string to enum: ['public','confidential','restricted']. For updateUserRole, enforce enum: ['admin','member'].
• Consolidate AI tools: remove processQuery or clearly document when it should be used instead of getProjectInsights/getTaskRecommendations/analyzeContract. If processQuery is a multi-agent orchestrator, rename to orchestrateQuery and describe its multi-step reasoning capability.
• Expand descriptions for low-signal tools (getMe, logout, getProjects, getUsers) to 100-150 chars. Include WHEN to call them and what they return. Example: 'Get current authenticated user. Call after login to retrieve user_id, email, and role for permission checks.'