sudo_run has a well-structured input schema with all parameters typed and described. The tool description is clear and security-conscious (explains password handling via SUDO_ASKPASS). However, the output schema is not documented, callers cannot predict the structure of the response. The tool is single-purpose and appropriately named with a verb prefix. Parameter descriptions are actionable and include examples. No critical gaps, but missing output documentation and lack of error recovery guidance prevent a higher score.

• Document the output schema explicitly. E.g., 'Returns {"text": string, "exit_code": integer, "stderr": string}' so callers know what to expect.
• Add error categorization and recovery guidance. E.g., 'If timeout occurs, the command may still be running, check system state before retrying.'
• Implement a dry-run mode or confirmation step before executing destructive commands. E.g., add a 'dry_run' boolean parameter that shows what would execute without running it.
• Tighten timeout_seconds constraint in description: 'timeout in seconds (default 120, range 1 - 3600)' to make bounds machine-parseable.
• Consider HTTP+SSE or Streamable HTTP transport for remote accessibility. STDIO limits this tool to local-only deployments.