Three tools with clear verb-noun naming (search_anime, get_episodes, get_episode_sources) and documented descriptions. All tools have input schemas with Zod validation and parameter descriptions. However, output schemas are not documented, responses are JSON.stringify'd without explicit field documentation. Parameter descriptions are present but minimal (avg ~40 chars). No error handling guidance, no pagination support despite potential for large result sets, and no indication of output structure for LLM planning. Naming is consistent and appropriate; composition is sound (each tool does one thing). Missing: output schema documentation, error recovery guidance, and result limits.
Get streaming sources for a specific episode.
Get the available episodes for a specific anime show ID.
Search for an anime by name. Returns a list of matching anime with their IDs, descriptions, genres, scores, and thumbnails.
Output schemas not documented. Tools return JSON.stringify'd results without specifying field names, types, or structure. LLMs cannot plan downstream calls or extract required data reliably.
No pagination or result limits documented. search_anime may return hundreds of results, risking context window exhaustion. No limit parameter, no total_count, no next_cursor in response.
No error handling guidance. Tools return JSON responses but do not document error cases, recovery steps, or what to do if a showId is invalid or episode not found.
Parameter descriptions are minimal (avg 40 chars). 'The ID of the anime show' lacks context on format, source, or how to obtain it. Descriptions should be 50-200 chars with actionable detail.
| Scored | Grade | Overall | Spec posture | Rubric |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-09-23 | D | 59 | 2026-07-28+ | v2 |
No chaining IDs documented. If search_anime returns results, what fields are included? Does get_episodes need only showId or also other metadata? Unclear dependencies force discovery calls.