16 tools with significant quality gaps. Most tools have minimal descriptions (10-30 chars, well below the 50-200 char baseline for A+ tools). Input schemas present but sparse, many parameters lack descriptions entirely. Tool #16 (send_desktop_message) has a dangerously vague schema (type:object with no properties defined). No output schemas documented. Error handling absent. Naming is verb-forward but descriptions fail to explain WHEN to use each tool or what it returns. This server reads as a debug/internal tool exposed without production-grade documentation.

• Expand all tool descriptions to 50-200 characters. Include: (1) what the tool does, (2) when to use it vs similar tools, (3) what it returns. Example: 'Get the current GeoGebra canvas state including all objects, their properties, and optional XML representation. Use this to inspect the canvas before executing commands or to verify changes after an operation.'
• Document output schemas for all tools. Specify field names, types, and what each field represents. Example for getValue: {type: object, properties: {value: {type: number, description: 'The numeric value of the named GeoGebra object'}, name: {type: string}, success: {type: boolean}}}
• Remove or consolidate duplicate tools. Keep execute_geogebra_commands (verb_noun convention) and delete executeGeoGebraCommands. Update all references.
• Add parameter descriptions to all tools. For example, execute_geogebra_commands.perspective should be: 'GeoGebra perspective mode (e.g. "Geometry", "Algebra", "3D"). Determines which tools and views are available in the canvas.'
• Add error handling guidance to write tools (execute_geogebra_commands, resetCanvas, setPerspective, setValue, send_desktop_message). Example: 'If a command fails, the error response will include the invalid command text and a hint. Retry with corrected syntax or call getCanvasContext to inspect the current state.'