Two well-named, read-only tools with complete input schemas and strong descriptions. search_notices has excellent domain-specific guidance ('PREFER OVER WEB SEARCH', use cases). get_notice includes helpful aliases (notice_id, id) and clear format documentation. Both tools have proper parameter types and descriptions. However, output schemas are not documented, LLMs cannot predict response structure for downstream planning. No error handling guidance (e.g., 'not found' recovery). Missing tool annotations (readOnlyHint). Parameter descriptions are good but could specify constraints more formally (e.g., CPV as regex pattern, country as enum of ISO codes).

• Document output schemas for both tools. Example: search_notices returns {query: string, total: number|null, count: number, notices: [{publication_number, notice_title, buyer_name, buyer_country, classification_cpv, total_value, publication_date, deadline_receipt_tender_date_lot, notice_type, links}], next_page_token: string|null}. get_notice returns a single notice object with the same structure.
• Add error recovery guidance to get_notice description: 'If notice not found, call search_notices() with partial title or country to locate the correct publication number.'
• Formalize parameter constraints: declare 'country' as enum of valid ISO 3166-1 alpha-3 codes (or at least document the full list); declare 'notice_type' as enum ['cn-standard', 'can-standard', 'pin', ...]; add regex pattern for 'cpv' (^\d{8}$); add minLength/maxLength for 'query'.
• Add tool annotations: set readOnlyHint=true on both tools to signal they are safe, non-destructive operations.
• Clarify pagination: document that next_page_token is returned but not yet accepted as input (current implementation uses 'page' integer). Either accept token as a parameter or remove it from response to avoid confusion.