Secbot exhibits significant definition quality gaps across all 7 tools. While schemas are present with typed parameters, descriptions are inconsistent, some tools have adequate descriptions (cloud_bucket_enum, s3_bucket_enum) while others are minimal or missing context. Critical issues: (1) execute_command and execgo_action lack clear guidance on when to use each; (2) install_tool has no description of what happens post-install or error recovery; (3) no output schemas documented for any tool; (4) parameter descriptions often lack constraints, ranges, or format guidance; (5) destructive tools (execute_command, execgo_action, install_tool) lack confirmation/dry-run patterns; (6) no error handling guidance visible in any tool definition. The server prioritizes breadth (7 tools) over depth of definition quality.

• Document output schemas for all 7 tools. Specify field names, types, and whether results are paginated. E.g., cloud_bucket_enum should return {accessible_buckets: [{name, provider, url}], total_tested, errors}.
• Add dry-run/confirmation parameters to execute_command, execgo_action, and install_tool. E.g., execute_command(command, dry_run=true) returns what would execute without side effects.
• Clarify execute_command vs execgo_action: document when to use each (e.g., 'execute_command for local shell; execgo_action for distributed agent control'). Consider merging or renaming for clarity.
• Add enum constraints to providers parameters (cloud_bucket_enum, cloud_metadata_detect) and explicit bounds to numeric parameters (timeout_ms: 100-15000, max_buckets: 1-200).
• Expand install_tool description to 100+ chars: explain what happens post-install, how to verify success, and what errors mean (e.g., 'Installs security tools via apt/brew/choco. Returns tool version on success. Fails if package manager unavailable, check system prerequisites.').