Two tools with clear, descriptive names and well-structured schemas. Both tools have good descriptions (150+ chars) and properly typed input parameters with constraints. However, output schemas are not explicitly documented in the source, and error handling guidance is minimal. Parameter descriptions are present but lack some actionable detail (e.g., what constitutes a 'risk level' in get_session_status). No tool annotations (readOnlyHint, destructiveHint) despite both being READ_ONLY operations. Naming follows verb_noun convention well (list_*, get_*). Pagination support is present with min/max constraints (1-200 items per page).

• Add formal JSON Schema output definitions for both tools. Document the structure of paginated responses, including fields like total_count, next_cursor, and per-item field types.
• Replace 'e.g. active, completed' and 'e.g. low, medium, high' with explicit enum constraints in the schema. This makes valid values machine-parseable and prevents LLM hallucination.
• Add readOnlyHint: true annotation to both tool definitions to signal to MCP clients that these tools are safe to call without side effects.
• Document error scenarios and recovery paths. E.g., 'If authentication fails (401), verify SEALGATE_API_KEY is set. If rate limited (429), retry after 60 seconds.'
• Expand parameter descriptions with actionable constraints. E.g., 'status: Filter by session status. Valid values: active, completed, failed, pending. Defaults to all statuses if omitted.'