Server has 4 tools with schemas and descriptions present, but significant quality gaps limit production readiness. delphi_project has an extremely complex schema (40+ parameters) with many undescribed or poorly described fields. delphi_file similarly overloads parameters. Descriptions are present but generic (10-50 chars for most tools). No output schemas documented. Error handling guidance absent. Tool names lack clear action verbs (delphi_project, delphi_file are domain-prefixed but not verb-led). Parameters lack enums for constrained values (e.g., 'action' accepts free-form strings instead of enum). No pagination support visible. Security concerns: file write operations (delphi_file with action='write') lack confirmation patterns or dry-run support.

• Rename tools to verb-led names: 'compile_delphi_project', 'manage_delphi_file', 'search_delphi_kb', 'get_tool_help'. This lets LLMs infer intent from the name alone.
• Convert 'action' parameter to enum in delphi_project and delphi_file. List all valid actions explicitly (compile, write, format, etc.) so LLMs pick from a constrained set.
• Add output schema documentation to each tool. Example: 'Returns: {success: bool, output: string, errors: [string], compiled_file: string}'. This enables chaining and error recovery.
• Expand parameter descriptions to 50-150 chars each. Include format hints: 'project_path: Path to .dproj/.dpr/.dpk file (required, must exist)' instead of just 'project file path'.
• Add dry-run support to delphi_file write/replace/delete actions. Return what would be changed without applying it, letting agents preview before committing.