Server has 12 tools with explicit schemas using TypeBox. Most tools have descriptions (10-200 chars), but several lack depth and actionable guidance. Parameters are typed but many lack descriptions or constraints. No output schemas documented. Error handling is basic (try/catch with generic messages). Tool names follow verb_noun convention well (gh_pr_view, memory_search). Composition is reasonable, tools are single-purpose. However, descriptions are often too brief to guide LLM selection, and parameter descriptions are sparse or missing entirely. No pagination guidance for list tools. No documented output structure for agents to plan downstream calls.

• Document output schemas for all tools. Specify what fields are returned (e.g., gh_pr_list returns [{pr_number, title, state, author, url}, ...]) so agents can chain calls and extract IDs.
• Add pagination parameters (offset/limit or cursor) and document result limits in descriptions. E.g., 'Returns up to 30 results. Use limit and offset for pagination.'
• Expand parameter descriptions with format and constraint details. E.g., 'repo: Owner/repo in format "owner/repo" (e.g., "torvalds/linux"). Defaults to current repo if omitted.'
• Categorize errors as retryable vs user-fixable. E.g., 'PR not found (404)' → user-fixable, suggest search_pr_list; 'Network timeout' → retryable.
• Add a dry-run or confirmation step for gh_pr_comment and memory_save. Return a preview of the comment/memory before posting, requiring explicit confirmation.