Two tools with basic schemas and descriptions, but significant gaps in parameter documentation and output schema clarity. Naming is acceptable but generic. No error recovery guidance. Schemas present but incomplete, parameters lack descriptions entirely. Output schemas are undocumented. This is a typical D-grade community server.

• Add descriptions to all parameters. For 'text' in parse: 'The .env-style text to parse. Supports KEY=value pairs, quoted values (single/double), and # comments. Multiline values are supported with proper escaping.'
• For 'env' in stringify: 'Environment variables as a string map (object with string keys and string values). Values will be automatically quoted if they contain spaces, special characters, or newlines.'
• Document output schemas in tool metadata. Add a 'outputSchema' field or update descriptions to state: parse returns {env: {[key: string]: string}}, stringify returns a plain string in .env format.
• Enhance tool descriptions with selection context. E.g., parse: 'Parse .env-style text into a key-value map. Use this to load environment configuration from text, handle comments and quotes automatically. Returns a plain object suitable for passing to stringify or other tools.'
• Add error recovery guidance. Catch validation errors early and return: 'Invalid input: <specific reason>. Expected format: KEY=value pairs, one per line. Comments start with #. Values may be quoted.' This lets LLMs self-correct.