Two simple tools with basic schemas and minimal descriptions. Both tools have input schemas with proper types, but descriptions are terse (under 100 chars) and lack context on when/why to use them. No parameter descriptions provided, LLMs cannot infer what 'text' or 'value' mean without additional guidance. No output schema documented. Error handling is present but generic ('ini failed: ...'). Tools are read-only and low-risk, but definition quality falls short of production standards.

• Add parameter descriptions to both tools. For to_json: 'text: INI-formatted string (sections as [header], key=value pairs)'. For to_ini: 'value: Plain object with string keys; nested objects become [section] headers; arrays not supported.'
• Document output schemas in tool descriptions. E.g., 'Returns a JSON object where top-level keys are bare keys and nested objects are sections from the INI file.'
• Expand tool descriptions to 150 - 250 characters. Include: what format is parsed/generated, when to use each tool, and any limitations (e.g., 'to_ini does not support arrays or duplicate keys').
• Improve error messages with actionable guidance. E.g., 'Invalid INI syntax: expected key=value or [section] at line 3. Check for missing = or mismatched brackets.' Include the invalid input snippet.
• Add examples in parameter descriptions (not in tool description). E.g., 'text: INI string like "[section]\nkey=value" or bare keys like "key=value"'.