Strong foundation with 9 well-named, verb-prefixed tools (list_, get_, search_, resolve_) and complete input schemas. All tools have descriptions (avg 85 chars, within baseline 34-392). Parameters are typed and described. However, output schemas are not documented in the visible code, only input schemas are shown. Error handling is minimal (no recovery guidance, no categorization). Tool descriptions lack WHEN/WHY context and dependency hints. No tool annotations (readOnlyHint, destructiveHint). Composition is sound: each tool has one responsibility, and naming is consistent and clear.

• Document output schemas for all 9 tools. Include field names, types, and examples. E.g., get_law should specify: {code: string, title: string, norms: [{id: string, text: string}], ...}.
• Add readOnlyHint: true to all 9 tool definitions to signal to agents that these are safe to retry and have no side effects.
• Expand tool descriptions to include WHEN/WHY context. E.g., 'Call list_laws() first to discover available law codes, then use get_law() to fetch details for a specific code.'
• Enhance parameter descriptions with format/constraint details. E.g., 'code: Law code (2-10 uppercase letters, e.g., BGB, DSGVO) or alias (e.g., gdpr).'
• Add error recovery guidance to tool descriptions. E.g., 'If law code not found, try search_laws() with a keyword or call list_laws() to see available codes.'