DevMind exposes 5 tools with minimal schema documentation and sparse parameter descriptions. All tools have basic descriptions (10-50 chars), but parameter descriptions are missing or trivial. Input schemas are present but lack detail: most parameters have no description field, and no enums/constraints are declared. No output schemas are documented. Error handling is absent, tools return raw text with no recovery guidance. The server follows a basic verb_noun naming pattern (fetch_*, read_*, list_*) but parameter naming lacks type suffixes (e.g., 'repo' should be 'repo_name' or 'repo_path'). No tool annotations (readOnlyHint, etc.) are present. Overall, this is a minimal proof-of-concept lacking production-grade documentation and validation.

• Add detailed parameter descriptions to every tool. E.g., fetch_github_repo: 'repo: Full GitHub repository name in format owner/repo (e.g., samnit007/devmind). Must be a public or accessible repo.'
• Document output schemas for each tool. E.g., fetch_github_repo returns {name, description, url, stars, language, topics}. search_web returns {results: [{title, url, snippet}], total_results}.
• Implement structured error responses with recovery hints. E.g., 'GitHub repo not found: samnit007/devmind. Verify the repo name and that it is public. Try search_web to find the correct repo URL.'
• Add input validation and constraints. Declare path parameter as 'relative file path, no ../ traversal allowed'; query as 'non-empty string, max 500 chars'; repo as 'pattern: ^[a-zA-Z0-9_-]+/[a-zA-Z0-9_.-]+$'.
• Add tool annotations (readOnlyHint: true) to all tools since they are read-only. This signals to clients that these tools are safe to call without user confirmation.