Single tool 'getReport' has a basic description (23 chars) and minimal parameter documentation. Input schema is present with type and description for jfrFilePath, but lacks critical details: no format constraints, no error handling guidance, no output schema documentation. The description 'Get full report of jfr file' is too terse to guide LLM selection. No pagination, no result limits, no structured output schema visible. Tool naming is acceptable (verb_noun pattern) but description falls well below the 50-200 char baseline for A+ tools (baseline avg 194 chars). No evidence of error recovery patterns, validation rules, or output field documentation.

• Expand tool description to 80-150 chars: 'Analyze a Java Flight Recording (JFR) file and return a comprehensive performance report including CPU, memory, I/O, and GC metrics. Requires an absolute path to a valid .jfr file.'
• Document the output schema explicitly in code comments or a separate schema definition. Specify: is it plain text, JSON, markdown? What sections does it contain? Example: 'Returns a markdown-formatted report with sections: Summary, CPU Analysis, Memory Analysis, GC Events, I/O Activity.'
• Add parameter validation and error messages. Catch FileNotFoundException, InvalidJFRException, etc., and return: 'File not found at {path}. Verify the absolute path and file permissions.' or 'Invalid JFR file: {reason}. Ensure the file is a valid Java Flight Recording.'
• Implement result chunking or pagination. If reports exceed 4KB, return a summary with a 'get_report_section' tool to fetch specific sections (CPU, Memory, GC, etc.) on demand.
• Add tool annotations (readOnlyHint=true) to signal this is a safe, non-destructive read operation. This helps agents prioritize it in exploration phases.