MCP server for Google Drive integration with file operations, folder navigation, search capabilities, and sharing management
MCP Drive lacks visible tool definitions in the provided source. Tool files are referenced (e.g., src/mcp/tools/file-move.ts) but their actual schemas, descriptions, and parameter definitions are not included in the code sample. Without access to the actual tool registration code, parameter schemas, and descriptions, scoring must be conservative. The server exports tool factories but the implementation details are opaque. STDIO-only transport further limits production readiness.
No visible tool schemas in provided source code. Tool files referenced (src/mcp/tools/*.ts) but actual parameter definitions, input schemas, and return types not included. Cannot verify JSON Schema compliance or parameter type definitions.
No tool descriptions visible in source. LLMs cannot determine when to select each tool or what it does. Descriptions are mandatory for tool selection reasoning.
Destructive operations (file-move-to-trash) lack visible confirmation or dry-run support. No evidence of error handling guidance or recovery paths for failed operations.
| Scored | Grade | Overall | Spec posture | Rubric |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-09-23 | F | 29 | 2026-07-28+ | v2 |
STDIO-only transport. Server is not remotely accessible and cannot be used by hosted MCP clients. Limits production deployment scenarios.
No visible error handling patterns. No evidence of actionable error messages, error classification (retryable vs fatal), or recovery guidance for LLM agents.