15 tools with basic schemas and descriptions, but significant gaps in parameter documentation, error handling, and LLM-optimized guidance. Most descriptions are generic (50-100 chars) and lack context for when/why to use each tool. Parameters present but many lack type constraints, enums, or validation hints. No evidence of output schema documentation, pagination support, or error recovery guidance. Tool naming follows verb_noun convention (positive), but composition issues exist (e.g., aws_cli_execute and eks_kubectl_execute are dangerously generic command runners). Security concerns: no evidence of secret injection patterns or permission gates for destructive operations.

• Replace aws_cli_execute and eks_kubectl_execute with domain-specific tools (e.g., deploy_to_eks, get_eks_cluster_status, scale_eks_deployment). Validate inputs server-side and return structured results, not raw CLI output.
• Document output schemas for all tools. Specify which fields are returned, their types, and which IDs/references enable chaining to other tools. Example: argocd_get_applications should return [{ application_id, name, status, sync_status, namespace }].
• Add confirmation/dry-run support to destructive tools. Implement a pattern like 'dry_run=true' parameter or a separate 'preview_*' tool variant. Return what would happen without executing.
• Add enum constraints and format specifications to parameters. Example: schedule parameter should document cron format (e.g., '0 9 * * MON'); revision should document git ref format; channel should accept both ID and name with resolution logic.
• Implement error recovery guidance. When a tool fails, return structured error with category (not_found, permission_denied, invalid_input, service_error) and actionable next step. Example: 'Channel not found. Available channels: #general, #engineering, #sales.'