This HTTP server exposes 7 tools with significant definition gaps. Tool names lack action verbs (e.g., 'POST /api/login' instead of 'authenticate_user'). Descriptions exist but are brief (avg ~80 chars, below the 194-char baseline). Input schemas are present but minimal: most tools have only 1-2 parameters with basic type info. No output schemas are documented. Error handling is absent, no guidance on retryability, user-fixable errors, or recovery paths. The server is not an MCP server; it is a raw HTTP API. Tool definitions appear inferred from HTTP routes rather than explicitly registered with MCP tool schemas.

• Rename tools to action verbs: 'authenticate_user', 'verify_totp', 'check_health', 'ingest_access_logs', 'get_probe_config', 'ingest_probe_data', 'enroll_probe'.
• Document output schemas for every tool. E.g., login returns {session_token, requires_2fa, user_id}; enroll returns {probe_token, subscription_details}.
• Add error handling guidance: 'If login fails with 401, credentials are invalid. If 429, rate limit exceeded, retry after 60s. If 500, server error, contact support.'
• Expand descriptions to 100-200 chars. Include WHEN to call the tool, WHAT it does, and WHAT it returns. E.g., 'Authenticate an admin user with username and password. Returns a session token on success or a 2FA requirement flag. Use this to initiate login flow.'
• Implement MCP protocol: wrap this HTTP API in an MCP server that registers tools with proper schemas, handles _meta, and negotiates capabilities. Use the MCP SDK for Node.js.