Server exposes 6 tools with basic naming and descriptions, but critical gaps in schema completeness, parameter documentation, and error handling. Tool names follow verb_noun convention (list_, get_, dispatch_), which is positive. However, most tools lack detailed parameter descriptions and output schemas are not documented. The dispatch_meta_agent tool accepts a generic 'payload' object with minimal guidance on structure. No evidence of error handling patterns, recovery guidance, or input validation. Descriptions are present but brief (avg ~80 chars), below the 194-char baseline for production tools. No tool annotations (readOnlyHint/destructiveHint) despite clear risk distinctions (5 READ_ONLY, 1 WRITE).

• Document output schema for each tool. Example: list_meta_agents should return {agents: [{id: string, name: string, description: string, ...}], total: number}. Use JSON Schema format.
• Add tool annotations: mark all 5 read-only tools with readOnlyHint=true; mark dispatch_meta_agent with destructiveHint=true (since it executes agents with side effects).
• Expand dispatch_meta_agent payload parameter: replace generic 'object' with explicit schema defining required/optional fields, types, and constraints. Document what payload structure each agent expects.
• Add parameter constraints and formats: agentId should specify format (UUID, alphanumeric, etc.); scope should list valid values (enum) or pattern; payload should document required keys.
• Add error handling guidance: document what errors dispatch_meta_agent can return (agent not found, invalid scope, execution timeout, etc.) and suggest recovery steps for each.