Three tools with complete JSON schemas and basic descriptions, but significant gaps in LLM-optimization and error guidance. Tool names use verb_noun pattern (route.apply, route.remove, route.show) which is good. Descriptions are present but generic (34-60 chars, below the 50-200 char baseline for A+ tools). Parameters have types and descriptions, but lack enums for constrained values (e.g., 'protocol' should be an enum). No output schemas documented. No error handling guidance. No security considerations for destructive operations. Schemas are well-formed JSON Schema but descriptions don't explain WHEN to use each tool or what happens on failure.

• Expand tool descriptions to 100-200 chars. Example: 'Apply a static route configuration. Use this to add a new route with destination, netmask, and nexthop. Returns route_id on success or error details if the route already exists or nexthop is unreachable.'
• Add enum constraints for 'protocol' parameter: {"type": "string", "enum": ["static", "dynamic", "bgp"], "description": "Routing protocol type"}
• Document output schemas for all three tools. Example for route.apply: {"type": "object", "properties": {"route_id": {"type": "string"}, "status": {"type": "string", "enum": ["created", "updated"]}, "message": {"type": "string"}}}
• Add error handling guidance in descriptions: 'On failure, returns error code and message. If nexthop is invalid, try route.show to verify available interfaces. If route exists, use route.remove first.'
• For route.remove, add a 'confirm' boolean parameter (default false) to require explicit confirmation before deletion, preventing accidental destructive operations.