This SDK exposes 9 tools with inconsistent quality. Most tools have basic descriptions (10-50 chars) and minimal parameter documentation. Tool schemas are present but sparse: parameters lack type constraints, enums, and validation guidance. No output schemas documented. Error handling is absent, no recovery guidance or categorization. Naming is reasonable (verb_noun pattern) but descriptions are too terse to guide LLM selection. The 'ctx' parameter in record_fruit is undocumented and appears to be framework-injected, violating the principle that all parameters should be explicit and described. No evidence of pagination, batching, or composition patterns. Security: no mention of permission gates, audit trails, or secret injection.

• Expand all tool descriptions to 100-250 chars. Include WHAT the tool does, WHEN to use it, and any prerequisites. Example: 'greet' → 'Generates a personalized greeting message for the given name. Use this to create friendly introductions or welcome messages. Returns a string greeting.'
• Document output schemas for all tools. Specify return type (string, object, array), field names, and types. Example: greet returns {greeting: string}; lookup_fruit_sku returns {sku: string, fruit_name: string}.
• Add parameter descriptions for all inputs. For 'fruit_name' and 'query', explain format expectations: 'fruit_name: The common name of the fruit (e.g., apple, banana). Case-insensitive.'
• Remove or document the 'ctx' parameter in record_fruit. If it is framework-injected, do not expose it in the schema. If it is required input, describe what it contains and how to construct it.
• Add error handling guidance. For broken_tool, document expected failure modes and recovery steps. For read_url_content, specify timeout behavior and retry guidance. Use pattern:recovery-guide.