Single tool 'delete_customer' has a basic description but lacks critical production-grade quality. The tool definition is visible in conformance/frameworks/mcp.json with a description and input schema. However, the description is minimal (5 words), parameter lacks detail about what 'customerId' represents or how to obtain it, and there is no documented output schema. The tool performs a destructive operation (DELETE) but lacks error handling guidance, confirmation patterns, or recovery instructions. No evidence of idempotency keys, audit logging, or permission gates in the tool definition itself. The framework appears to be a safety/authorization wrapper (agent-safe-pipeline) rather than a production MCP server with proper tool definitions.

• Expand tool description to 50 - 150 chars: 'Delete a customer record from the CRM system. This is irreversible. Requires the customer ID (UUID format). Returns success/failure with affected record count.'
• Add parameter description for customerId: 'The unique identifier of the customer to delete (UUID format, e.g. 550e8400-e29b-41d4-a716-446655440000). To find a customer ID, use search_customers() first.'
• Document output schema: { success: boolean, deleted_customer_id: string, deleted_at: ISO8601_timestamp, error?: string }
• Implement confirmation pattern: add optional 'confirm: true' parameter or return { status: 'confirmation_required', message: 'Delete customer X? This cannot be undone.' } and require a second call with confirmation.
• Add error handling: return structured errors like { error: 'customer_not_found', message: 'Customer ID not found. Try search_customers() with name or email.', retryable: false } instead of raw exceptions.