Token-optimizer has 6 tools with mixed quality. Tool names follow verb_noun convention (check_, run_) which is good. However, critical gaps exist: tool #6 (run_command_digest) has NO description visible in source; parameter descriptions are sparse or missing across most tools; output schemas are completely undocumented; error handling guidance is absent. Only 2 of 6 tools have descriptions meeting the 10-1024 char baseline. Parameters like 'workspacePath', 'taskSummary', 'executionProfile' lack constraint documentation (ranges, enums, format). No evidence of pagination, result limits, or chaining IDs in responses. Security concerns: tools accept file paths and commands with minimal validation hints visible.

• Add a description to run_command_digest immediately. Minimum 20 chars explaining what it does and when to call it vs run_test_verdict.
• Document output schemas for all 6 tools. Specify returned fields, types, and which IDs/references are included for chaining (e.g., does run_test_verdict return a verdict_id for follow-up calls?).
• Add parameter descriptions for all undocumented params. For 'workspacePath', specify format (absolute path, must exist). For 'taskSummary', specify expected length and content (e.g., 'Brief description of code changes, 10-500 chars').
• Add error handling guidance to tool descriptions. E.g., 'If workspace not found, returns error with available paths. If test timeout, returns partial results with timeout flag.'
• For WRITE tools (run_test_verdict, run_command_digest), add a 'dry_run' boolean parameter defaulting to false, or document a confirmation step in the description.